Getting Real About Real-Time Marketing #5: The End of the War Room

 The following is part of a series of blog posts related to 2013’s hottest point of social discussion—real-time marketing. This is the second post in the series. The first post is here. The second post is here. The third post is here. The fourth post is here.

The latest “Getting Real About Real-Time Marketing” post discussed three types of real-time marketing, one being opportunistic.

Oreo executed opportunistic real-time marketing exceptionally well during the Super Bowl. It woke the industry up to the possibilities, and the combination of a massive real-time event being watched by millions (the Super Bowl), the lights going out as a fluke and having a team ready to respond is one that will not come around again any time soon.

Read More

Real-Time Reveals Business’ Weaknesses

It’s been nearly two months since the #Blackout at the Super Bowl, and marketers have been scrambling to figure out how they can follow in the footsteps of Oreo, Audi and others by creating viral success stories as they join in consumer conversations.

The reality is the brands with #Blackout success stories have already explored that territory, and brands attempting to do the same thing are bound be criticized for being unoriginal and, worse, annoying users. Instead of trying to copy what brands like Oreo did, brands should be asking what real-time means for them (e.g., social customer service, proactively responding to brand mentions, newsjacking, etc.), which first means doing some digging to figure out if your organization can handle it. It will likely be a very revealing exercise.

Read More